WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
DONATE
  • About
    • HOW WE WORK
    • WHERE WE WORK
    • OUR STAFF AND TRUSTEES
    • JOBS & INTERNSHIPS
    • VOLUNTEER
    • RUSHTON CONSERVATION CENTER
    • STRATEGIC PLAN
    • DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT
    • FAQs
  • LATEST
    • BLOG
    • IN THE NEWS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • PHOTOS
  • PROGRAMS
    • BIRD CONSERVATION
    • COMMUNITY FARM
    • EDUCATION
    • LAND PROTECTION
    • STEWARDSHIP
    • WATERSHED PROTECTION
  • NATURE PRESERVES
    • ASHBRIDGE PRESERVE
    • HARTMAN MEADOW
    • KESTREL HILL PRESERVE
    • KIRKWOOD PRESERVE
    • RUSHTON WOODS PRESERVE
  • EVENTS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
    • BARNS & BBQ
    • RUN-A-MUCK
    • WILDFLOWER WEEK
    • ECOCENTRIC EXPERIENCE
    • RUSHTON NATURE KEEPERS (RNK)
    • ACCESS Program
  • Support
    • WAYS TO GIVE
    • SPONSOR THE TRUST
    • CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
    • JOIN THE SYCAMORE SOCIETY
    • LEGACY SOCIETY & PLANNED GIVING
    • DELCO Gives 2025
  • CAMPAIGN FOR KESTREL HILL PRESERVE

Creek Week: Crayfish Commotion

June 23, 2021 By Watershed Protection Team

Chester County is home to some of the most beautiful landscapes on the east coast with its rolling hills, beautiful open grasslands and bubbling brooks. The county is home to headwaters, the groundwater source, of many streams that will eventually lead to the Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers, which will flow into the Atlantic Ocean. There is one interesting creature that is frequently overlooked when thinking about our creeks and streams: the crayfish.

Crayfish are small crustaceans that can grow to 7 inches in length, they look like “mini” lobsters with colorations that vary from dark brown to a brilliant blue (USDA, 2021). There are over 500 species in the United States and 12 are native to Pennsylvania. While they are amazing creatures, certain invasive crayfish present many threats to our local waterways.

These fascinating arthropods are found in small creeks, usually burrowed under large rocks or under fallen trees. Their lives begin as eggs which the mother carries under her tail for seven weeks. Once they hatch, the larvae will remain attached under her abdomen for another few weeks. When they are on their own, their main food source is tadpoles, insects and worms. Crayfish are commonly nocturnal, and will hunt at night while remaining in their burrows during the day. In under a year, they will be ready to mate in the fall and lay eggs in spring. One crayfish can lay up to 100 eggs and restart the life cycle again (Britannica, 2019).

The rusty crayfish, Orconectes rusticus, named for the rust colored spots on their backs and the virile crayfish, Orconectes virilis, are the most common invasive crayfish affecting our local waterways in Pennsylvania. The rusty crayfish is native to the Ohio river basin while the virile crayfish is native to the Missouri river, Mississippi river and Great Lakes (USGS, 2019). They are particularly harmful to our local environment because they have different adaptations that are better suited to displace the native species of Pennsylvania. They are bigger, stronger, and mature faster, creating a combination that out-competes the native species for resources. They also can live close to each other at about 20 per square foot in comparison to the native crayfish that can only have about 1 comfortably living per square foot. The invasive rusty crayfish competes with native species of crayfish for aquatic plant life that provides valuable shelter, nesting ground and food. Once the rusty crayfish is introduced, 60% of the aquatic plant life can decrease, causing a domino effect of damage to the ecosystem (Schneck, 2013). Frogs and salamander eggs are the most at risk of population decline, as their eggs are a favorite snack of the invasive species. Both the invasive crayfish and native amphibians feed on similar diets of macroinvertebrates, organisms with no internal spine that can be seen with the naked eye. This caused populations to decrease as much as 70% in areas where non-native crayfish have been found.

When it comes to the invasive species of crayfish, their introduction has been difficult to contain, leading to new regulations at the state and federal level. The species were commonly introduced to the local watersheds in a few ways; the most common being distribution to be used in restaurants. The crayfish would fall out of trucks or get loose and walk to suitable water sources that allow them to survive and reproduce (McGinnis, 2019). Another means of introduction into the natural environment is the release from tanks by owners that no longer want them, mixing imported exotic crayfish with the native population. This has been curbed by legislation that prohibits the commercial moving of crayfish without the removal of their heads first (Reed-Harry, 2014). For local anglers, the heads must be removed as soon as they leave the water or be used as live bait in the same water from which they came.

While native crayfish are great indicators of water health and important parts of aquatic ecosystems, the invasive species are major disturbances that must be carefully managed and controlled to allow waterways to return to their original balance. The best thing that can be done at the personal level is to fish responsibly and not return any caught crayfish to the water in which they were found. Up to 50 non-native crayfish can be removed by anglers after removal of their head, and may be used as live bait in the same water source they were caught in (Reed-Harry, 2014). Additionally, be sure to do research on any crayfish that may be owned as pets, not allowing non-native species to be released into local waterways.

By Gloria Avila

Resources:

Virile Crayfish, Northern Crayfish (Faxonius Virilis) – Species Profile. Virile Crayfish, Northern Crayfish (Faxonius virilis) – Species Profile. (n.d.). https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=215.

McGinnis, J. (2019, August 6). ‘Aggressive, delicious’ crayfish invading Bristol Township. Bucks County Courier Times. https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/news/20190806/aggressive-delicious-crayfish-invading-bristol-township/2.

Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2019, March 20). Crayfish. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/animal/crayfish

Reed-Harry, J. (2014, October 1). PDF. Harrisburg, PA; Pennsylvania Aquaculture Advisory Committee.

Filed Under: Nature, Science, Watershed

Creek Week: Beaver Business

June 22, 2021 By Watershed Protection Team

In the middle of our spring tree planting, the Watershed Protection Team had quite the surprise when we spotted evidence of beaver activity in Ashbridge Preserve. A single tree was knocked down along Ridley Creek, with distinctive teeth marks that indicated a beaver had found itself a tasty meal. While it is too soon to tell if the beaver will make a home at Ashbridge, we wanted to take this opportunity to share the history of beavers in the area and the special role they play in stream ecosystems.

A young tree felled by a beaver at Ashbridge Preserve. Photo by author.

Beavers are the largest rodent found in North America, reaching 3 feet in length and weighing between 30 and 60 pounds. They have small faces, stocky brown bodies, and a distinctively hairless, paddle-shaped tail. Their tail allows beavers to be distinguished from groundhogs, which have short, furry tails, as well as muskrats, which have long, hairless tails. Beavers are well-adapted for an aquatic lifestyle; when they dive underwater, their eyes are protected by a set of transparent eyelids and their ears and nose are protected by watertight membranes. They can remain underwater for 15 minutes, and their oily, waterproof fur helps them stay dry. Their webbed feet and rudder-like tail allows beavers to swim at speeds of 5 miles per hour.

Chompy the beaver was donated to Willistown Conservation Trust and currently lodges in the Rushton Conservation Center. Note its glossy fur and hairless, paddle-shaped tail. Photo by author.

Beavers were once abundant throughout North America, from northern Mexico all the way up to the southern Arctic. However, they were heavily hunted for their waterproof pelts by European colonizers, and their numbers dropped rapidly. In Pennsylvania, beavers were wiped out by the beginning of the twentieth century. Reintroduction efforts in the 1920s proved successful, and beaver populations have been stable in Pennsylvania since the 1930s, though they likely are not as abundant as they were before European colonization. There are a few known beaver colonies near Willistown in Ridley and Darby creeks and evidence of beaver activity can occasionally be spotted in Willistown, and most recently at Ashbridge Preserve.

Beavers are perhaps nature’s most effective engineers, changing entire ecosystems to fit their needs. They build their homes, called lodges, almost exclusively in the middle of slow-moving ponds, where the surrounding water acts as a moat that protects them from terrestrial predators. If no such pond can be found, beavers dam streams and rivers to create the perfect pond. To create their dams, beavers cut down trees with their chisel-like teeth, which constantly grow and self-sharpen. They generally prefer trees with diameters of less than 3 inches, but will cut down larger trees if small trees are not readily available. They construct their dam with logs, branches, twigs and grasses and seal everything into place with mud.

Once the dam backs up enough water, beavers build wood and mud lodges in the middle of the pond that can be 6 feet high and up to 40 feet wide. These lodges have 1 or 2 underwater entrances, a ‘living area’ above the water line, and a small air hole in the top to provide ventilation. A lodge houses a colony made of a breeding pair (which mate for life), the current years’ kits, and the surviving offspring from the year before. Before the kits are born, the female drives out the second year young. After the young are driven out from the den, they disperse to find new habitat and form their own colonies.

Beaver settlement causes widespread changes to an ecosystem. The first noticeable change is the clearing of several trees — typically small — that the beaver will use to build its dam. After the dam is built, the creek will start to back up, flooding the adjacent land and forming a small pond. More trees may be felled to build the beaver’s lodge. What was once a wooded valley with a small stream becomes an open pond bordered by wetland vegetation. This new pond supports a host of wetland species that would not otherwise be found in the area — ducks, geese, herons, turtles, fish, frogs, salamanders and more. Even beaver lodges create habitat: the underwater base of the lodge provides shelter for young fish and the top of the lodge can be a nesting area for birds.

A beaver pond and associated wetlands in Vermont. Photo by author.

Beyond supporting a biodiverse ecosystem, beavers and their dams improve local water quality. Beaver ponds trap and slow down water, reducing downstream flooding during major storm events. By slowing down the flow of water, beaver dams also allow more water to seep through the soil and replenish groundwater resources. As water passes through a beaver pond, fine sediment and pollutants are filtered out, resulting in cleaner water downstream of the dam.

Beavers inhabit a pond until they deplete all nearby food sources, usually after 20 to 30 years. At this point, they abandon their pond and lodge and move on to new habitat. Without constant maintenance, the dam slowly breaks down and eventually breaches. The pond drains and the previously submerged seed bank begins to germinate. Shrubs and trees re-establish in the area and, eventually, the open land turns back into a wooded valley.

By Anna Willig

References

Beaver. (n.d.). Pennsylvania Game Commission. Retrieved May 27, 2021, from https://www.pgc.pa.gov:443/Education/WildlifeNotesIndex/Pages/Beaver.aspx

Beaver. (2016, April 25). Smithsonian’s National Zoo. https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/beaver

Beaver | National Geographic. (n.d.). Retrieved May 27, 2021, from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/facts/beaver

Wohl, E. (2021). Legacy effects of loss of beavers in the continental United States. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 025010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd34e

Filed Under: Nature, Science, Watershed

Creek Week: The Trouble With Lawns

June 21, 2021 By Watershed Protection Team

Few landscape features define American suburbia like the lawn. Drive through a neighborhood anywhere in the US and you are likely to see the same landscape: houses surrounded by a tidy patch of grass, with a few gardens thrown in. Lawn care could be considered a national hobby — the average American spends 70 hours a year tending to their lawn, mowing, clearing, watering and spraying. Lawns are so ubiquitous, so expected, that we rarely consider what the consequences of our tidy little lawn might be.

Although individual lawns do not cover much ground (the average American yard is only 0.19 acres), the summed area of lawns is staggering. Turfgrass, the cropped grass that differentiates a lawn from a field, is the most irrigated crop in the United States, and as of 2005, it covered 40.5 million acres, a number that has only increased since then. To put this number in perspective, if all lawns were put together, they would cover Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland combined, with a few acres to spare. 

While this vast area of lawn may not seem like an environmental problem — after all, it’s still a green area, taking in carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen — the consequences of our obsession with lawns are hard to overstate. Most turfgrasses are not native to the United States (even the famed Kentucky Bluegrass is native to Europe, Asia and Northern Africa), meaning that nearly every one of those 40.5 million acres of lawn is devoid of native plant species. Instead of a biodiverse landscape that can sustain a complex ecosystem, we maintain acres and acres of ecological desert.

Starting at the base of the food chain, lawns provide little habitat and few food sources for insects. Lawns are often devoid of leaf litter, which provides crucial habitat for benign and beneficial insects, including our beloved fireflies. Small wildflowers are often removed as weeds, depriving bees and other pollinators of crucial food sources. Without this food source, insects move elsewhere or die off. Once the insects are gone, there is little to sustain the birds, frogs and other small animals that rely upon insects as a food source.

In addition to lacking food and habitat that insects and wildlife need to survive, many lawns are poisoned with pesticides. A 2012 report from the EPA on pesticide use found that, annually, homeowners spend $3.3 billion on pesticides and apply 59 million pounds of pesticide to their lawns. As these numbers do not include pesticide use by lawn care companies, the true amount of pesticides applied each year on lawns is even higher.

Pesticides used on lawns can devastate organisms they were never supposed to impact. Many pesticides, particularly insecticides, are indiscriminate, killing not only target insects such as mosquitos, but also beneficial insects such as butterflies and bees. Insects are not the only victims—birds, frogs or turtles that eat insects with pesticides in their system ingest these pesticides as well, often with deadly results.

Pesticides applied to lawns readily runoff into aquatic systems, impacting the entire waterway. The use of pesticides is so extensive that they are commonly found in urban waterways and, increasingly, in groundwater. Due to the prohibitively high costs of long-term ecological studies, we do not know how the presence of low levels of pesticides in waterways alters aquatic ecosystems.

In addition to impacting aquatic organisms, the presence of pesticides in waterways also impacts humans. A CDC biomonitoring program that samples human blood for a range of environmental contaminants has found some type of pesticide in nearly every blood sample, suggesting that most, if not all, Americans have low-levels of pesticides in their blood. The persistence of many pesticides is of particular concern: though DDT has been banned in the US for nearly 40 years, it is not uncommon to detect DDT and its degradation products in humans today. Just as we do not understand the impacts of chronic, low-level pesticide exposure on ecosystems, we do not understand these impacts on human health.

In addition to applying millions of pounds of pesticides to lawns, homeowners also apply millions of pounds of fertilizers to lawns. Though fertilizers pose fewer immediate health concerns to humans than pesticides, their overuse can also devastate ecosystems. Fertilizers enter streams and rivers through runoff and ultimately end up in estuaries, lakes, and bays. The resulting increase of nutrients in these systems can cause massive blooms of algae. Algae blooms rapidly deplete the oxygen in the water, causing massive ‘dead zones’ such as those found in the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. In some areas, the algae bloom can even release a neurotoxin dangerous to humans and pets.

While the problems caused by lawns are far-reaching, many can be addressed by simply doing less to care for our lawns. Here are 10 ways you can have a more eco-friendly yard:

  1. Before any expected rainfall, avoid applying pesticides and fertilizers to reduce runoff of pesticides and fertilizers into waterways.
  2. Test your soil! This can tell you exactly what kind and how much fertilizer you might need for your lawn, reducing the risk of overuse (and saving you money!).
  3. Before applying pesticides, contact your County Extension Services Office to determine if you actually have a pest problem that needs to be treated.
  4. Avoid using lawn services that apply pesticides on a regularly scheduled basis. Many of the pesticides used are long-lasting, meaning that any application after the initial application is unnecessary. Only re-apply if you have determined you have a problem that needs to be treated.
  5. Consider eliminating the use of pesticides in your lawn. Many pests, especially insects, have natural predators that can thrive in your lawn and control your pests for you.
  6. Raise the blade of your lawnmower. Taller grass has a longer root system, allowing it to soak up more water and reduce runoff into waterways,
  7. Mow less frequently, especially in early spring. A study found that lawns that were not mowed for the month of May had five times more bees, which are crucial pollinators, than lawns that were regularly mowed. Mowing less frequently also reduces greenhouse gas emissions from lawnmowers.
  8. Allow your lawn to become a little messy. Weeds and small wildflowers increase the biodiversity of your lawn, providing more food sources and creating more habitat for insects and other wildlife. Grass clippings and leaf litter provide habitat for insects and nutrients for your lawn, reducing the need for fertilizer.
  9. Consider replacing some of your lawn with a native wildflower garden or, if you have space, a meadow filled with native grasses and wildflowers. Native plantings provide far more habitat for insects and birds than lawns and often require less care after the initial establishment. They also capture more runoff and prevent pollutants from reaching waterways.
  10. Reach out to local neighborhood groups or homeowners’ associations to advocate for greener lawn care! Reducing pesticide and fertilizer use at a neighborhood scale can have a massive impact on local waterways and ecosystems.

Remember that you can make a difference! Every acre of the 40.5 million acres of lawn represents an acre of habitat that is yet to be created. Making small changes in your backyard can make a world of difference for local wildlife and waterways, and at a quicker rate than you might expect. Small actions can add up to big results, and it is far better to make some changes than no changes at all.

By Anna Willig

Resources

To learn more about the extent of lawns: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Lawn/lawn.php

To learn more about the benefits of converting lawns to meadows: https://conservationtools.org/guides/151-from-lawn-to-meadow#_ednref1

To learn more about proper fertilizer use: https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/what-you-can-do-your-yard

To learn more about proper pesticide use:

https://extension.psu.edu/are-you-thinking-about-using-pesticides

Filed Under: Nature, Science, Watershed

Plastic Free July in the Age of COVID-19

July 2, 2020 By Watershed Protection Team

As we launch into Plastic Free July, we find it particularly challenging in the presence of COVID-19, when retailers seem to be employing more single use plastics than ever. Watch this video presentation by Lauren McGrath, Willistown Conservation Trust’s Director of Watershed Protection, in a conversation about how you can decrease your plastic consumption while staying safe, including a community discussion around different ways to reduce consumption through smarter shopping and extending the shelf life of what you purchase. This online presentation was originally presented on July 1, 2020.

Filed Under: Conservation, Watershed Tagged With: clean water, ecology, environment, plastic free, pollution

Clean Water Science Pioneer – Ruth Patrick

May 13, 2020 By Watershed Protection Team

Dr. Ruth Patrick was one of the most important scientists to study freshwater systems.  She was a pioneer when it came to discussing pollution and emphasized the importance of connecting science to governmental policy and helped to pave the way for future female scientists.

Born in Topeka, Kansas, Patrick was interested in science from a very young age. Her father first gave a microscope when she was 7 years old, and her interest in the microscopic world grew from there. Patrick attended Coker University in South Carolina where she studied Botany, after which she went on to earn her PhD in Botany from the University of Virginia.

Ruth Patrick continued her career in our very own backyard. She began working at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia in 1933 as an assistant curator of microscopy – an unpaid position. It was not until eight years later that she finally was put on as a paid scientist. Patrick focused her studies on freshwater streams and used her role at the Academy to pursue research looking at diatoms. In 1947 she established the limnology department – now called the Patrick Center for Environmental Research. In 1973 her career at the Academy reached new heights as she became the first woman to chair the Board of Trustees at the Academy.

Dr. Ruth Patrick in a greenhouse housing artificial streams.

In one of her most famous studies, Patrick went to Conestoga Creek in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania with a team of environmental scientists. They set out to identify all the pollutants present in the stream. From there they also identified the animals and plants in the system. This combination of data allowed Patrick to develop what later became known as the Patrick Principle. She analyzed the data to look for patterns in diatom presence/absence in relationship to types of pollution. She discovered clear trends in environmental preferences of diatom species. From this she was able to work in reverse. By looking at a microscope slide from a stream site, she could diagnose the type of pollution based on the diatom community present.

Outside of her work for the Academy, Ruth Patrick was a huge advocate against water pollution and made a lot of progress in communicating with stakeholders. She played a large role in the creation of the Clean Water Act, she advised President Johnson on issues concerning water pollution, and later advised President Reagan on acid rain.

In 1970 she was the 12th woman to be elected to the National Academy of Science. In 1975 she became the first woman (and first environmentalist) on the Board of Directors for DuPont where she helped to steer decisions towards reducing chemical pollution. Two of the most notable awards Patrick received were the John and Alice Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement in 1975 and the National Medal of Science which she was awarded by President Clinton in 1996.

Dr. Ruth Patrick examining plant life in a stream.

Patrick made a huge impact on the field of environmentalism, but her accomplishments are even more impressive in the context of her time frame. Female scientists in the 1930s were unheard of, but Patrick helped to change the story. She showed the world that women can make monumental impacts in the scientific community, and her work continues to frame the environmental movement to this day.

Dr. Ruth Patrick continues to inspire the work of the Watershed Protection Program at Willistown Conservation Trust. Her work paved the way for current researchers to better understand the world beneath the water, how our actions on land make an impact on our aquatic community and how passionate individuals can make the world a better place. 

Dicke, W. (2013). Ruth Patrick, a Pioneer in Science and Pollution Control Efforts, Is Dead at 105. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/us/ruth-patrick-a-pioneer-in-pollution-control-dies-at-105.html

Story 85: “Celebrating a Pioneer.” (2011). 200 years 200 stories.  The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University. https://ansp.org/exhibits/online-exhibits/stories/celebrating-a-pioneer/

Morrison, J. (2013). Ruth Myrtle Patrick, 105, expert on water pollution. The Philadelphia Inquirer. https://www.inquirer.com/philly/obituaries/20130924_Ruth_Myrtle_Patrick__105__expert_on_water_pollution.html

Filed Under: Watershed

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next Page »

CONTACT

925 Providence Road
Newtown Square, PA 19073
(610) 353-2562
land@wctrust.org

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Copyright © 2025 · WCTRUST.ORG