WILLISTOWN CONSERVATION TRUST

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
DONATE
  • About
    • HOW WE WORK
    • WHERE WE WORK
    • OUR STAFF AND TRUSTEES
    • JOBS & INTERNSHIPS
    • RUSHTON CONSERVATION CENTER
    • STRATEGIC PLAN
    • INCLUSION, ACCESS, AND BELONGING
    • FAQs
  • LATEST
    • BLOG
    • IN THE NEWS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • PHOTOS
  • EDUCATION
    • GROUP EDUCATION
    • LAND PROTECTION
    • STEWARDSHIP
    • BIRD CONSERVATION
    • COMMUNITY FARM
    • WATERSHED PROTECTION
    • ECOCENTRIC EXPERIENCE
    • RUSHTON NATURE KEEPERS (RNK)
  • NATURE PRESERVES
    • ASHBRIDGE PRESERVE
    • HARTMAN MEADOW
    • KESTREL HILL PRESERVE
    • KIRKWOOD PRESERVE
    • RUSHTON WOODS PRESERVE
  • EVENTS
    • EVENT CALENDAR
    • BARNS & BBQ
    • RUN-A-MUCK
    • WILDFLOWER WEEK
    • ACCESS Program
  • Support
    • WAYS TO GIVE
    • SPONSOR THE TRUST
    • CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
    • JOIN THE SYCAMORE SOCIETY
    • LEGACY SOCIETY & PLANNED GIVING
    • VOLUNTEER
    • DELCO GIVES 2026
  • OUR NEWEST PRESERVE
    • OUR NEWEST PRESERVE- KESTREL HILL

Creek Week: The Trouble With Lawns

June 21, 2021 By Watershed Protection Team

Few landscape features define American suburbia like the lawn. Drive through a neighborhood anywhere in the US and you are likely to see the same landscape: houses surrounded by a tidy patch of grass, with a few gardens thrown in. Lawn care could be considered a national hobby — the average American spends 70 hours a year tending to their lawn, mowing, clearing, watering and spraying. Lawns are so ubiquitous, so expected, that we rarely consider what the consequences of our tidy little lawn might be.

Although individual lawns do not cover much ground (the average American yard is only 0.19 acres), the summed area of lawns is staggering. Turfgrass, the cropped grass that differentiates a lawn from a field, is the most irrigated crop in the United States, and as of 2005, it covered 40.5 million acres, a number that has only increased since then. To put this number in perspective, if all lawns were put together, they would cover Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland combined, with a few acres to spare. 

While this vast area of lawn may not seem like an environmental problem — after all, it’s still a green area, taking in carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen — the consequences of our obsession with lawns are hard to overstate. Most turfgrasses are not native to the United States (even the famed Kentucky Bluegrass is native to Europe, Asia and Northern Africa), meaning that nearly every one of those 40.5 million acres of lawn is devoid of native plant species. Instead of a biodiverse landscape that can sustain a complex ecosystem, we maintain acres and acres of ecological desert.

Starting at the base of the food chain, lawns provide little habitat and few food sources for insects. Lawns are often devoid of leaf litter, which provides crucial habitat for benign and beneficial insects, including our beloved fireflies. Small wildflowers are often removed as weeds, depriving bees and other pollinators of crucial food sources. Without this food source, insects move elsewhere or die off. Once the insects are gone, there is little to sustain the birds, frogs and other small animals that rely upon insects as a food source.

In addition to lacking food and habitat that insects and wildlife need to survive, many lawns are poisoned with pesticides. A 2012 report from the EPA on pesticide use found that, annually, homeowners spend $3.3 billion on pesticides and apply 59 million pounds of pesticide to their lawns. As these numbers do not include pesticide use by lawn care companies, the true amount of pesticides applied each year on lawns is even higher.

Pesticides used on lawns can devastate organisms they were never supposed to impact. Many pesticides, particularly insecticides, are indiscriminate, killing not only target insects such as mosquitos, but also beneficial insects such as butterflies and bees. Insects are not the only victims—birds, frogs or turtles that eat insects with pesticides in their system ingest these pesticides as well, often with deadly results.

Pesticides applied to lawns readily runoff into aquatic systems, impacting the entire waterway. The use of pesticides is so extensive that they are commonly found in urban waterways and, increasingly, in groundwater. Due to the prohibitively high costs of long-term ecological studies, we do not know how the presence of low levels of pesticides in waterways alters aquatic ecosystems.

In addition to impacting aquatic organisms, the presence of pesticides in waterways also impacts humans. A CDC biomonitoring program that samples human blood for a range of environmental contaminants has found some type of pesticide in nearly every blood sample, suggesting that most, if not all, Americans have low-levels of pesticides in their blood. The persistence of many pesticides is of particular concern: though DDT has been banned in the US for nearly 40 years, it is not uncommon to detect DDT and its degradation products in humans today. Just as we do not understand the impacts of chronic, low-level pesticide exposure on ecosystems, we do not understand these impacts on human health.

In addition to applying millions of pounds of pesticides to lawns, homeowners also apply millions of pounds of fertilizers to lawns. Though fertilizers pose fewer immediate health concerns to humans than pesticides, their overuse can also devastate ecosystems. Fertilizers enter streams and rivers through runoff and ultimately end up in estuaries, lakes, and bays. The resulting increase of nutrients in these systems can cause massive blooms of algae. Algae blooms rapidly deplete the oxygen in the water, causing massive ‘dead zones’ such as those found in the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. In some areas, the algae bloom can even release a neurotoxin dangerous to humans and pets.

While the problems caused by lawns are far-reaching, many can be addressed by simply doing less to care for our lawns. Here are 10 ways you can have a more eco-friendly yard:

  1. Before any expected rainfall, avoid applying pesticides and fertilizers to reduce runoff of pesticides and fertilizers into waterways.
  2. Test your soil! This can tell you exactly what kind and how much fertilizer you might need for your lawn, reducing the risk of overuse (and saving you money!).
  3. Before applying pesticides, contact your County Extension Services Office to determine if you actually have a pest problem that needs to be treated.
  4. Avoid using lawn services that apply pesticides on a regularly scheduled basis. Many of the pesticides used are long-lasting, meaning that any application after the initial application is unnecessary. Only re-apply if you have determined you have a problem that needs to be treated.
  5. Consider eliminating the use of pesticides in your lawn. Many pests, especially insects, have natural predators that can thrive in your lawn and control your pests for you.
  6. Raise the blade of your lawnmower. Taller grass has a longer root system, allowing it to soak up more water and reduce runoff into waterways,
  7. Mow less frequently, especially in early spring. A study found that lawns that were not mowed for the month of May had five times more bees, which are crucial pollinators, than lawns that were regularly mowed. Mowing less frequently also reduces greenhouse gas emissions from lawnmowers.
  8. Allow your lawn to become a little messy. Weeds and small wildflowers increase the biodiversity of your lawn, providing more food sources and creating more habitat for insects and other wildlife. Grass clippings and leaf litter provide habitat for insects and nutrients for your lawn, reducing the need for fertilizer.
  9. Consider replacing some of your lawn with a native wildflower garden or, if you have space, a meadow filled with native grasses and wildflowers. Native plantings provide far more habitat for insects and birds than lawns and often require less care after the initial establishment. They also capture more runoff and prevent pollutants from reaching waterways.
  10. Reach out to local neighborhood groups or homeowners’ associations to advocate for greener lawn care! Reducing pesticide and fertilizer use at a neighborhood scale can have a massive impact on local waterways and ecosystems.

Remember that you can make a difference! Every acre of the 40.5 million acres of lawn represents an acre of habitat that is yet to be created. Making small changes in your backyard can make a world of difference for local wildlife and waterways, and at a quicker rate than you might expect. Small actions can add up to big results, and it is far better to make some changes than no changes at all.

By Anna Willig

Resources

To learn more about the extent of lawns: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Lawn/lawn.php

To learn more about the benefits of converting lawns to meadows: https://conservationtools.org/guides/151-from-lawn-to-meadow#_ednref1

To learn more about proper fertilizer use: https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/what-you-can-do-your-yard

To learn more about proper pesticide use:

https://extension.psu.edu/are-you-thinking-about-using-pesticides

Filed Under: Nature, Science, Watershed

The Bees of Rushton Farm: A Pollinator Perspective on Willistown Conservation Trust & Environmental Education

February 13, 2021 By Communications Team

One Sunny midsummer day in 2012 on Rushton Farm, the bees decided to swarm. Noah, a certified apiarist–and the sustainable gardening manager teaching our cohort agro-ecology best practices–knew exactly what to do, and quickly sprang into action. He was able to quickly and safely locate the queen bee and remove the correct branch the swarm had formed on. It was a quick and mesmerizing event that created a lasting memory for all us interns and students who were there for the swarm…and then it was back to tending the row crops we were growing for the community supported agriculture (CSA) and food donations. It was a unique and fun way to work and learn, and an experience that would only have been possible due to the efforts of the Trust to not only create and restore the 6-acre sustainable farm but to make it accessible to us city dwellers and students that would have otherwise never known what existed beyond the hedgerows.

This experience reminded me of a time growing up in the Midwest. While playing outside in my backyard on a south facing slope, I discovered bees entering and exiting a nickel sized hole in the ground. Curious to see what they were doing, I went inside and got a jar. Then I put the jar over the hole, and for about 5 stings worth of time, or 20 minutes or so, I could study the bees. This event, like the swarm at Rushton, created an indelible and memorable window of observation that I would forever remember. As the interns and I worked with the staff and hosted student groups at the farm, I could not help but be reminded how such events can make a lasting and meaningful impact on young people as they begin to explore their natural world and make ecological connections. 

As my internship progressed as part of the Penn MES program, the opportunity to study bees, and specifically native pollinators, arose. Working with Lisa Kiziuk and Fred de Long, I was able to reach out to bee expert Sam Droege from the Beltsville, MD bee lab. He assisted me with designing a baseline pollinator survey, told me where to get the glycol for the pan traps (painted yellow, blue and white solo cups with PVC holders) I would hand make and deploy in three areas around the farm, and even where to get the specimen collection bags and how to store the specimens for later ID (which Sam’s lab and interns there performed). 

I would soon conclude my field research at Rushton after collecting the specimens from the pan traps throughout the summer and sending them to the Bee lab for ID. Thanks to the sustainable farming practices, focus on native plantings and abundant open space, we were able to identify 49 unique species of bees at Rushton Farm.

My capstone project at Penn would focus on deadly and pervasive insecticides and crop protection products called Neonicotinoids–which are used as seed treatments on over 95% of corn and soy planted in the U.S–and which were not used anywhere on Rushton Farm. At the end of 2012, after all the Rushton farm crops had been sustainably grown and harvested, I published “The Producer Pollinator Dilemma: Neonicotinoids and Honeybee Colony Collapse.” This project was the most in-depth project I’d taken on to date, and it began with “The Bees of Rushton Farm, A Pollinator Perspective on Sustainable Agriculture,” which was the independent project preceding the capstone, and where we published our baseline pollinator survey with the native pollinators we observed and collected in and around the farm that summer.

What began as a summer internship spurred a lifelong academic and ecological interest in native bees, agro-ecology, and how we can all work together to restore our land with an optimal mix of wildflowers, native grasses, and sedges. This is how the PollinatorPatch nonprofit campaign to restore One Million Acres, One Backyard Patch at a time, soon evolved from my new job with Applied Ecological Services as part of the large scale Restoration Field Crew in the Midwest, and then Project Manager for the Wetland Reserve Program in Iowa, in conjunction with the NRCS and State DNR.

It was during these projects and assignments that I realized a pollinator optimized seed mix was needed, by eco-region, and bloom period, and with more than the CP42 standard of 9 forbs (3 in each bloom period). On Earth Day in 2015 PollinatorPatch.com was launched to offer folks the best available 30+ species seed mix for their backyard and to show them why it’s important to help the bees, just like Noah did that one sunny midsummer day on Rushton Farm when the bees swarmed. 

This past summer the entire experience came full circle when Monarch Joint Venture conducted a vegetation survey to see what native plants and wildflowers particularly were in bloom from a pollinator-optimized seed mix in the 3rd year of maturation.

“Everything is everything,” and we are all connected on our planet and by our collective actions. Small events can lead to bigger learning experiences and the unique and memorable outdoor education offered at Rushton is invaluable and makes bigger impacts in time thanks to the work of the Willistown Conservation Trust and its dedicated team.


Ben Reynard | was an Intern at Willistown Conservation Trust’s Rushton Farm in 2012. After earning a Masters’s degree in Environmental Studies at Penn, Ben went on to work for Applied Ecological Services as an Ecosystem Restoration Supervisor. Additionally, he has launched the nonprofit, Pollinator Patch to restore backyard habitat. Ben is father to a three year old son and is restoring a 3-acre goat prairie and an 1850’s pioneer cabin he hopes to make into an eco-home for his son to learn eco-homesteading and ecological restoration. To learn more about Ben and his path visit: https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjamin-reynard-03a4b358/ or https://www.lps.upenn.edu/degree-programs/mes/community/0514.

Filed Under: agroecology, Farm, Native Plants, Nature, Science

Road Salt and Its Impact on Fresh Water

January 12, 2021 By Communications Team

As winter quickly approaches so does the threat of salt pollution. Since the 1940s, salt has been the number one choice for fighting road ice in the United States. Over the last five years, PennDOT used an average of 844,000 tons of salt per year to keep Pennsylvania’s roads free of ice during the winter months. As effective as salt is at melting ice, it can cause major environmental problems after it washes off roads and into nearby waterways. Scientists have known for a long time that salt can be a serious pollutant in freshwater ecosystems, affecting multiple species of fish, insects, amphibians, and plants. More recent studies have shown that road salt is the main culprit of salt pollution in the northern United States.

According to a USGS survey, 84% of streams in urbanized areas of the northern United States have seen increases in chloride levels attributed to road salt. While 40% of streams have experienced levels that are considered dangerous to aquatic species. Furthermore, 29% of those streams have seen spikes in chloride levels during the winter that would make the water unsafe for drinking. 

Armed with this knowledge, PennDOT and local municipalities have made efforts to limit the amount of salt laid on roadways. PennDOT limits salt treatments to high-traffic areas and dangerous intersections or curves. At the same time, municipalities have started mixing sand in with salt to improve traction and reduce the overall amount of salt used. Unfortunately, these changes might not be enough as private businesses and homeowners still contribute significantly to the amount of salt introduced into the environment. Over-salting of sidewalks and parking lots is far too common since private snow shovelers are understandably more concerned with the safety of pedestrians than the environmental costs associated with using salt. 

However, there are ways to achieve a balance that prioritizes safety while also taking into account the risk of salt pollution. The most straightforward solution could be sweeping up salt from sidewalks after the ice has melted but before a snowmelt or rain event can wash the salt away. Not only does this prevent salt from reaching our freshwater ecosystems but the salt can be reused during the next snowstorm to save some money. Adding salt before snowfall rather than after is another technique that could reduce the amount of salt needed to keep sidewalks free from ice. Another option is to reduce the amount of salt used by cutting it with sand or even beet juice like some Canadian cities have successfully experimented with. All of these methods can be implemented by anyone who finds themselves shoveling snow during the winter.  

Even those of us who do not have any snow shoveling responsibilities can play a big part in addressing this issue. The Izaak Walton League is a national organization that trains citizen scientists to measure the amount of salt in their local streams, especially after snowstorms. This kind of data can help determine the local impact or source of salt pollution. Maybe more valuable, measurements collected by citizen scientists will increase the national dataset used to help scientists and policymakers make decisions about mitigating the effects of our increased reliance on road salt.

For more information about becoming a volunteer citizen scientist, you can visit iwla.org.

Filed Under: Conservation, Lunch & Learn, Science, Watershed

From Tops of Trees to the Base of the Food Chain

October 13, 2020 By Lauren McGrath

There is a chill in the air and the leaves are starting to turn, signaling that fall is here! Have you ever wondered what happens to the leaves that fall every autumn?  When the trees shed their leaves, the leaves continue to play an important role in the environment. They fall onto the land and return the nutrients back into the soil or blow into streams, where they are vital in sustaining our freshwater ecosystems through winter months.  As the leaves gather in our waterways, they get caught on rocks and on sticks and form masses called leaf packs.

Leaf packs are so much more than just bundles of leaves and sticks. They are nutrient rich pockets in the stream that provide cover and food for a wide diversity of stream insects. Raw leaves that enter the stream are hard to for insect larvae to eat, and need to be broken down before they can be consumed.  When leaves enter the waterway, they quickly become coated in a slimy biofilm, a name for a collection of algae, fungi and bacteria, which work quickly to condition leaves and turn them into a more palatable meal for macroinvertebrates. Some insects, like stoneflies, prefer to scrape the biofilm off of the leaves while others, like mayflies enjoy eating the leaf itself! As the leaf is broken down by the biofilm or shredded by insects, nutrients get carried downstream by flowing water and provide sustenance for other parts of the stream. Insects like caddisflies, live just downstream of the leaf packs and collect the floating leaf particles to eat.

Aquatic insects are a discerning group of organisms, and have preferences in what leaves they consume. Just as you and I may not order type of food at a restaurant, not all insects will prefer the same leaves! It has been documented that stream insects prefer native plants to non-native plants, and most insects studied have preferred types of native plants. It is important to have a diverse community of trees and shrubs along our waterways to provide a variety of leaves every fall to feed the aquatic community.

Leaf packs sustain a variety of insects throughout the winter months, and the annual addition of leaves into our headwater streams is critical for the health and survival of the aquatic ecosystem. These leaves feed the insects at the base of the food chain, which in turn feeds the many fishes, birds and mammals that rely on streams to survive.  We can be good stream stewards by planting a diverse community of native trees and shrubs along waterways and leave leaves where they fall to allow the nutrients to be reincorporated into the ecosystem to sustain another generation of life!

You can learn more about leaf packs from our friends at Stroud Water Research Center here!

Stonefly larvae are scrapers or grazers and eat the biofilm off of leave.
Predators exist wherever there is prey!  This dragonfly larva hunts the shredders and grazers in and around the leaf pack, and nutrients from the leaves are transformed up the food chain.

Mayfly larvae are shredders, and prefer to eat leaves which have been conditioned by biofilm.
Leaf packs gathering in Okehocking Run at Rushton Preserve.

Filed Under: Nature, Science, Watershed

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

CONTACT

925 Providence Road
Newtown Square, PA 19073
(610) 353-2562
land@wctrust.org

501(c)(3) EIN 23-2841453

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Copyright © 2026 · WCTRUST.ORG